sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Remko van der Vossen <wich AT stack.nl>
- To: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:39:04 +0100
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:27:33PM +0100, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Friday 11 of January 2008 17:29:21 Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Shall we verify (non-strict) the tarball still matches the GPG and
> > then re-sign with a cross-certified key?
> Sounds practical. I guess my update fixed a few, since the newer keys were
> already cross-certified.
Of course people should be prodded to cross certify their key, a non
cross certified key with a signing subkey is not secure.
Regards, Remko.
Attachment:
pgpy44QkBR6KJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Eric Sandall, 01/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter, Remko van der Vossen, 01/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.