Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>]

On Monday 07 of January 2008 13:06:34 Alexander Tsamutali wrote:
> I was afraid of such scenario but didn't check. Ok so my vote is for
> lang-devel scheme and therefore to preserve current name.
>
> Also i think that gaze behavior may be changed and shouldn't affect
> the decision on section name. All sorcery tools should understand
> where we're talking about spell and where about section. In short:
> spell names and section names should not affect each other. Other
> opinions here?
That gaze behaviour is a feature. But it could be expanded with a parameter, 
where you would explictly say if you want to see the version of the section 
or a spell (xfce is like that*).

I'm for keeping python-devel. Imho it would be even better to rename it to 
python, but that depends on the previous feature if we want the same comfort.

* Ethan: comes up more often than you might think?? Do you have any proof?

-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.