Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Bearcat M. Sandor" <sourcemage AT feline-soul.com>]

On Saturday 29 September 2007 in an email titled "[SM-Discuss] the case for 
gcc 4.2.x" Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>over the last evenings, I've rebuilt my system on glibc 2.6.1 with gcc
>4.2.1 to see how ready our grimoire is for the new gcc. Here's the
>summary:
>591 spells cast
>8 spells failed
>1 of those 8 was gcc related, mozilla (who is surprised that this
>age-old codebase breaks? ;)
>
>I'm already working on a fix for mozilla, most of the other failures
>were easy enough to fix.
>First of all, let me say that it's pretty awesome to have a failure rate
>of only 1.3% for a rebuild including a couple dozen updates. Thanks to all
>who contributed :) I remember times when we did much worse.
>Second, I think this test shows that gcc 4.2.1 is ready to go into test
>for more widespread testing. So if no one screams "NO!", I'll integrate
>the update after the next stable-rc is cut.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo!

What?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.