sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:43:12 +0200
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> over the last evenings, I've rebuilt my system on glibc 2.6.1 with gcc
> 4.2.1 to see how ready our grimoire is for the new gcc. Here's the
> summary:
> 591 spells cast
> 8 spells failed
> 1 of those 8 was gcc related, mozilla (who is surprised that this
> age-old codebase breaks? ;)
>
> I'm already working on a fix for mozilla, most of the other failures
> were easy enough to fix.
> First of all, let me say that it's pretty awesome to have a failure rate
> of only 1.3% for a rebuild including a couple dozen updates. Thanks to all
> who contributed :) I remember times when we did much worse.
> Second, I think this test shows that gcc 4.2.1 is ready to go into test
> for more widespread testing. So if no one screams "NO!", I'll integrate
> the update after the next stable-rc is cut.
It seems like the mozilla problem is a freetype2 api change issue, not a
gcc one, so that leaves us with 0 gcc related failures.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x,
Arwed von Merkatz, 09/29/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x, Arwed von Merkatz, 09/29/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x, Bearcat M. Sandor, 09/29/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x, David Brown, 09/29/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the case for gcc 4.2.x, David Kowis, 09/29/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.