sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:13:41 +0200
I simply think this is an unneeded complication. I favour simplicity over
accuracy here.
Would it be really advantageous for integrations if the new items were under
a
new title like here instead under the first? I think you'd get a conflict any
way (for sure with the second). Adding more numbers to the title wouldn't
help much here.
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
David Brown, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
Jaka Kranjc, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
David Brown, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
Jaka Kranjc, 05/31/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating, David Brown, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
Jaka Kranjc, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
David Brown, 05/31/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating, Jaka Kranjc, 05/31/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] History Entry Formating,
Jaka Kranjc, 05/31/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.