sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Bearcat AT feline-soul.com>
- To: "SMGL - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:06:25 -0600 (MDT)
> Really, I like grub much better than lilo, but for compile from source
> lilo is the x86-64's only option currently supported. I've been
> meaning to create a grub-bin spell for x86-64 guys to install.
> Created statically so there aren't any dependencies on glibc of any
> bit type. (for that matter I've also been wanting to mess with grub2
> but haven't gotten the chance).
>
> Thanks,
> - David Brown
I always thought grub was more common and loved then lilo. If this is the
case why is there so little interest in a grub for x86-64? I would thing
that if there was interest it would have been done by now.
Any ideas about why it hasn't been done?
Bearcat
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
Martin Spitzbarth, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
Ingo Arndt, 05/02/2007
-
[SM-Discuss] Firefox + Flash 9,
Tommy Boatman, 05/02/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Firefox + Flash 9, Eric Sandall, 05/02/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Firefox + Flash 9, Jeremy Blosser, 05/03/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Firefox + Flash 9, sqweek, 05/18/2007
-
[SM-Discuss] Firefox + Flash 9,
Tommy Boatman, 05/02/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
David Brown, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
seth, 05/02/2007
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?, seth, 05/03/2007
-
Message not available
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
seth, 05/02/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?, David Brown, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 05/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] AMD64 and grub ?,
Ingo Arndt, 05/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.