sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg

From: Matthew Clark <MatthewClark AT InLesserTerms.net>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:50:14 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:

>
> That's not the point of z-rejected only spells with license issues go there
> and we need a z-binary where binary spells can go with clean licenses...
>

Ah. I knew it was for license issues, but I didn't realize that was the
sole criteria. Cool. Me learnt sumthin.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGJ9YF7vwGAOVJvJ8RAuZ5AKCICanRgzwp9Wm0l3823RRE5BQ9vwCfaN5o
nRotjrQvfqWLrj1+ikxAyJE=
=3c5Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg , (continued)