sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:49:18 +0200
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:29:53PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Apr 19, Arwed von Merkatz [v.merkatz AT gmx.net] wrote:
> > If we remove all monolithic X11 spells, the check_if_xorg... can all be
> > removed, since the only available xorg will be the modular one. That'll
> > make spells cleaner too.
>
> You would want to leave it for a while, because x is big and important and
> one of the things people tend to put off upgrading for a long time.
Definitely yes. My point was more that if we do get rid of
xfree*/xdirectfb, we can eventually get rid of the conditionals in
DEPENDS and simply do normal dependencies.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
George Sherwood, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Matthew Clark, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/19/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg, Matthew Clark, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/19/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg, Eric Sandall, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/19/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Matthew Clark, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/19/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/19/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/19/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.