Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>]

Thomas Orgis wrote:
> Am Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:09:33 +0200
> schrieb "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>: 
> 
>> Descriptions and various dependencies in test(i.e. spell foo depends on
>> X11-LIBS but it also needs libfoo and libbar when using -modular) are the
>> main reasons for it not being in test.
> 
> The descriptions are an issue - particulary since upstream even doesn't
> have an opinion on these apparently.
> But could that help:
> 
> http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ModuleDescriptions?highlight=%28module%29
> 
> ?
> On the technical side, I must say that I don't have monolithic xorg on
> any box. The modular one works fine. Sometimes I forget that it's not
> standard already;-) Some stuff cast out of higher knowledge than by
> dependencies, but getting it into test would help these...
> 
> 
> Thomas.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

I've been running it for months without a problem.  It really should go
into test.

Jeremy