Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Improved modutils init script comments please

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
  • To: "Andra?? 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Improved modutils init script comments please
  • Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:33:16 -0800

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:24:29AM +0100, "Andra?? 'ruskie' Levstik" wrote:
> On 12:24:18 am 2007-01-25 Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, "Andra?? 'ruskie' Levstik" [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> > > I'm attaching the improved moduitls init script I've been working on
> > > today.
> > >
> > > First my position on module loading...
> > >
> > > I belive this should be done in a single script not like we currently
> > > have spread out something in asa something in wine etc...
> > >
> > > So this is my idea...
> > >
> > > Have a single script that handles all of this like we currently use
> > > but acctually make use of this facility.
> > >
> > > So enough chitchatter here's the script attached.
> >
> > If we take this approach then surely this:
> >
> > SUBSYSTEMS="alsa wine lirc drm oss"
> >
> > should be in a sysconfig file or something that spells add themselves
> > independent of modultils init script and not the other way around. Or
> > better yet, the script just looks for any files that are flagged as the
> > ones to use (/etc/modules.* with +x or something, I don't know).
>
> It is that one is only fallback and it would default to "" anyway...
>
> Well the +x idea would work as well...

or /etc/modules.d/* with +x I like to keep my /etc/ organized




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page