sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] jasper license
- Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:13:56 +0200
The spell for jasper (a free JPEG-2000 implementation) is in z-rejected. The
rejected message claims this:
Restrictions due to jpeg-2000 patents - check
http://www.ece.uvic.ca/~mdadams/jasper/LICENSE
Am I missing something here because I can't see anything about patent issues
in that document? It looks like a BSD-style license. Also the project page
[0] only mentions "JPEG-2000 Part-1 standard (i.e., ISO/IEC 15444-1)", which
I believe isn't a reference to a patent. Also Debian's jasper package is in
the main section [1], not in non-free.
So is there a valid case here for keeping jasper in z-rejected? Kdelibs can
use it, and I wouldn't want to cross-reference z-rejected.
[0] http://www.ece.uvic.ca/~mdadams/jasper/
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libjasper-1.701-1
--
Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
Attachment:
pgp0MEsMQqg0p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] jasper license,
Juuso Alasuutari, 12/25/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] jasper license,
Treeve Jelbert, 12/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] jasper license, Juuso Alasuutari, 12/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] jasper license,
Treeve Jelbert, 12/26/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.