sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:34:45 -0800
George Sherwood wrote:
> Is there any way we can reconsider all the traffic going to
> #sourcemage-commits now? I have always used that channel to see what is
> being updated and how that effects updates that I am working on and
> lately if I need to do a git pull between updates, but with all the
> feeds going in there now it is very difficult to pick out the commits.
> I am not against having a channel for those security feeds, but let it
> have its own channel. I already subscribe to a few security mailing
> list and I am just don't think they belong in the commits channel.
I agree. We can setup #sourcemage-security for security notices.
Currently those notices (and others) hide the commit messages in
#sourcemage-commit.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits,
George Sherwood, 11/25/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits, Andrew Stitt, 11/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits, Eric Sandall, 11/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.