sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:41:22 -0800
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:53:27PM +0400, George Sherwood wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there any way we can reconsider all the traffic going to
> #sourcemage-commits now? I have always used that channel to see what is
> being updated and how that effects updates that I am working on and
> lately if I need to do a git pull between updates, but with all the
> feeds going in there now it is very difficult to pick out the commits.
> I am not against having a channel for those security feeds, but let it
> have its own channel. I already subscribe to a few security mailing
> list and I am just don't think they belong in the commits channel.
I agree. The security stuff, while important, is probably not appropriate
on the _commits_ channel.
-Andrew
--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits,
George Sherwood, 11/25/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits, Andrew Stitt, 11/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] #sourcemage-commits, Eric Sandall, 11/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.