sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: johnc AT neto.com
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, dgoller AT satx.rr.com, seth AT swoolley.homeip.ne, Lubomir Blaha <tritol AT trilogic.cz>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:18:32 -0500
On Friday 01 September 2006 15:35, dgoller AT satx.rr.com wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:56 am
> Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b
> To: Lubomir Blaha <tritol AT trilogic.cz>johnc
> Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Lubomir Blaha wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I bought new hardware (AMD64X2) and I want migrate my existing
> >
> > SMGL box
> >
> > > (AthlonXP) to 64bit. Is it possible? I don't wanna install
> >
> > everything again
> >
> > > from x86_64 iso. Sometimes I need to run 32b apps (binary games)
> >
> > so I need
> >
> > > "Multilib way". I can't find any howto or similar text.
> >
> > Install it into a separate partition that you can chroot to. Make
> > sure
> > to copy the kernel from the iso into your /boot when you do this so
> > that
> > you can boot 64/32 hybrid style. Then you can build a pure 64-bit
> > kernel from that. If you need details/walkthrough, I'm on irc.
> >
> > You have to install everything again from the x86_64 iso to get
> > enough
> > 64-bit stuff to bootstrap from. We don't support native
> > cross-compilation for this converstion yet.
> >
> > And we don't technically support multilib. You can enable multilib
> > in
> > the relevent spells, but spells that break with multilib are your
> > own
> > problem and installing the multilib headers are your own problem.
> > If
> > you really want multilib supported, you can volunteer to maintain
> > the
> > multlib headers and be the central contact.
> >
> > Most of the x86_64 developers/users here run a pure 64-bit 64-bit
> > system
>
> My suggestion is to answer all sorcery question regarding multilib with
> "N" on glibc and gcc, and cast smgl-emul32 (in the tarball referenced
> below this has already occured)
>
> It is a collection of 32bit libs that allow you to run 32bit
> applications, it should even allow you to run your 32bit games, as a
> matter of fact i would like to hear from you if they do not.
> Then i would work on smgl-emul32 to make sure your games do work with it.
>
> The smgl-emul32 spell is in essence what other distros do for multilib,
> with one major difference, the glibc on other multilib systems is built
> natively, here everything is static.
>
> So follow swooley's suggestion by starting things in a chroot.
> I would suggest using this tarball to start from:
>
> http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/sourcemage/mirror/smgl-x8
>6_64.tar.bz2
>
> Installing from the x86_64 CD in existence would have you work around
> the arch spec change since creation of the CD (CHOST changed from
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>
> If you have any questions regarding the x86_64/smgl-emul32 install, find
> me on IRC 'morfic' or 'morphish'
>
> hope this helps,
>
> Daniel
>
> > without multilib because we tend to run everything from source and
> > not
> > require proprietary games for our enjoyment (nethack is good enough).
> >
> > Again, see me in irc (swoolley) to talk more.
> >
> > Seth
> >
> > > Thanks for any suggestion
> > >
> > > Lubomir
> > >
> > > --
> > > Win98 is called Win98 because it is 98% slower than Linux.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Guys,
I am attempting a conversion myself, and am understandingly interested.
Couple of questions if I may.
Seth,
Let me see if I follow you.
1) Install into a partition I can chroot into. OK. Is this to be a
temporary
install only to chroot into and build a pure 64bit kernel?
2) Copy kernel into my /boot so I can boot into the 64/32 bit kernel. Are
you
saying that I can boot into the 64/32 bit kernel using my 32bit "root
partition", and then can chroot into the install partition from step 1)
above?
3) If the answer is yes to above I can now build a pure 64bit kernel
4) Since the first install was temporary I install the iso again to a
permanant partition which will be a pure 64bit bootstrap system. Is sorcery
and a codex installed?
Daniel,
You say do what Seth recommends but start from the distribution:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/sourcemage/mirror/smgl-x86_64.tar.bz2.
That distribution doesn't applear to have a kernel. Are you saying to use
the
iso for steps 1,2,3) above and the distribution for step 4) to get a
bootstrap system?
Thanks,
John
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b,
dgoller, 09/01/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b, Lubomir Blaha, 09/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b,
johnc, 09/04/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b, seth, 09/04/2006
-
Message not available
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b, johnc, 09/11/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b,
Daniel Goller, 09/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL migration form 32b to 64b, Daniel Goller, 09/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.