sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:40:13 +0300
Summary so far: cast works. What doesn't is storing depends info, and that
makes at least dispel, gaze, and cleanse uncooperative.
I cast my test ams spell with this line:
optional_depends "cmt mcp-plugins rev-plugins swh-plugins vco-plugins" \
"" "" "to install example sound patches"
Everything went fine during cast, but things in INSTALL didn't work. I had in
there 'if is_depends_enabled $SPELL cmt; then', which failed. That was
because the line in /var/state/sorcery/depends is indeed:
ams:cmt mcp-plugins rev-plugins swh-plugins vco-plugins:on:optional::
After changing the line in install to 'if is_depends_enabled $SPELL "cmt
mcp-plugins rev-plugins swh-plugins vco-plugins"; then' the examples
installed properly.
'dispel --user-deps' doesn't prompt about recasting ams when I dispel one or
all of the plugin spells.
'gaze dependencies ams 2' displays this:
cmt mcp-plugins rev-plugins swh-plugins vco-plugins (optional)
'gaze depends <plugin spell>' doesn't work.
'cleanse --nofix ams' doesn't recognize when one of the plugin spells is
missing.
On Friday 18 August 2006 09:17, Paul Mahon wrote:
> It is not documented to work like that and isn't supposed to. It's more
> than likely a bug cause by something not being quoted as it should,
> which means that you'll get inconsistent results... ie the depends
> information could say it depends on a spell called "glibc gcc" while
> cast may turn that into two spells, cleanse may not which would cause
> all sorts of weirdness.
--
Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
Attachment:
pgplgc8w7wGw6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Flavien Bridault, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Bearcat M. Sandor, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Paul Mahon, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Andrew, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, seth, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Pieter Lenaerts, 08/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Robert Figura, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.