sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
- To: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:30:29 -0700
What kind of behavior do you want, that a single prompt supports both, or two
separate ones?
Is it single-pole double-throw or double-pole double-throw?
As with any misfeature, it's good to make sure it's really operating
desirably.
Personally, I see little reason to support this feature.
Seth
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:17:07AM +0300, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> On Friday 18 August 2006 09:17, Paul Mahon wrote:
> > It is not documented to work like that and isn't supposed to. It's more
> > than likely a bug cause by something not being quoted as it should,
> > which means that you'll get inconsistent results... ie the depends
> > information could say it depends on a spell called "glibc gcc" while
> > cast may turn that into two spells, cleanse may not which would cause
> > all sorts of weirdness.
>
> I'll test to see what happens in those cases. A bug or not, it's
> nevertheless
> something I think we should support.
>
> --
> Juuso Alasuutari
> [[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Flavien Bridault, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Bearcat M. Sandor, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Paul Mahon, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Andrew, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, seth, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Pieter Lenaerts, 08/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
seth, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line, Robert Figura, 08/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] multiple depends in one line,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/18/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.