sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Pieter Lenaerts <e-type AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:16:16 +0200
Op vr, 09-06-2006 te 17:22 +0200, schreef Jaka Kranjc:
> On a similar note, we could however have git complain if the commit doesn't
> include a HISTORY change or even refuse to commit without one (excluding
> grimoire and section files).
I see the use for it in all general stuff, I don't think it is a good idea
to enforce this.
it shouldn't be a problem to make a small correction to a commit without
a history entry when a typo or something like that slipped in.
--
Pieter Lenaerts
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org - "Linux so advanced it may well be magic"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Flavien Bridault, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 06/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Flavien Bridault, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Pieter Lenaerts, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Pieter Lenaerts, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Tony Smith, 06/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Treeve Jelbert, 06/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser, 06/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.