sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Flavien Bridault <vlaaad AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:48:36 +0200
Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 12:22 -0500, Jeremy Blosser a écrit :
> On Jun 05, Flavien Bridault [vlaaad AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > Le lundi 05 juin 2006 ? 11:51 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) a ?crit :
> > > On Jun 05, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > > > The only real candidate standing right now is git
> > >
> > > I guess not all the data has probably made it back here. For all the
> > > other
> > > SCMs we've tried, basic performance and interface has proved a major
> > > issue.
> > > Arwed can speak more to these since he's the one doing most of the
> > > head-to-head testing, but while SVK is a good bit faster than SVN it's
> > > still quite slow and unwieldy.
> >
> > So it is still useful that I continue to test SVK for the disk section ?
>
> I'd say keep working as you are til you hear otherwise, unless you find you
> really hate what you're doing now for some reason. In that case you could
> move back to p4 or on to git but you'd need to bring your latest changes
> across of course.
Ok, I can continue to work with svk, but I was wondering if it would not
be simpler for you to have disk and video (from Arwed) sections back in
p4 before doing the whole import in git. But if you rather like to wait
to do that in the same time, that's not a problem.
--
Flavien Bridault
Disk, Graphics, Graphics-libs sections Guru
Source Mage GNU/Linux - http://www.sourcemage.org
irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/03/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Flavien Bridault, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 06/05/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Flavien Bridault, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser, 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Pieter Lenaerts, 06/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Pieter Lenaerts, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jaka Kranjc, 06/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Tony Smith, 06/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Eric Sandall, 06/07/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 06/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.