Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On May 10, David Kowis [dkowis AT shlrm.org] wrote:
> Andrew Stitt wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:15:52PM -0500, David Kowis wrote:
> >> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> >>> Looking over the docs, we should have started the cauldron lead vote 
> >>> last
> >>> week... I guess we missed getting into it with the other stuff going on.
> >>>
> >>> We could pick it up now... however, we're in a transition spot where we
> >>> would lack real candidate options.  All the current Leads are already
> >>> Component Leads.
> >>>
> >>> I personally don't like the idea of postponing a vote for any reason, 
> >>> but
> >>> I'm bringing this up in case someone wants to make a motion we put this 
> >>> off
> >>> a bit.  If we waited a month on this vote (this year only) we would
> >>> probably have more candidates available, assuming we manage to elect 
> >>> some
> >>> more leads in the next couple of weeks.
> >>>
> >>> Again, I'm not actually proposing we do that, but if some of you think 
> >>> we
> >>> should, make a motion so it can get resolved.  Otherwise the PL needs to
> >>> just get this vote started.
> >> So in the interest of potential competition, I'll motion that the vote
> >> for Cauldron Lead Position be postponed until next month, just for this
> >> year. That does mean that the next person will serve a slightly shorter
> >> term.
> >>
> > 
> > I second the motion.
> 
> Before this blossoms into a full vote, I'm proposing that we just do
> this, and if someone has an issue with it, put it up as an issue vote.
> It doesn't bother me any, and if someone has an issue, well we've got an
> issue voting process ;)

Alright... we're allowed to do it this way if no one objects.

If anyone doesn't like this, please make a motion it be put to a regular
vote of the leads.  Otherwise we'll put the Cauldron Lead vote cycle off
until the beginning of June.

Attachment: pgpvGM7Cl4rLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature