sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:03:44 -0500
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Don't think there's a reason to do that, especially when we don't
> include those fonts in fontconfig by default.
>
Aha, this is why it was failing to begin with :-).
> We do have the urw type1 fonts, it's ghostscript-fonts-std, installed to
> /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts, but that path isn't included in
> fontconfig, maybe we should change that.
>
I didn't know that. We can create /etc/fonts/conf.d/<something>.conf or
we can simply symlink this directory from /usr/share/fonts. I think
symlink is better (provided that it works). Any objections?
Sergey.
-
[SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
David Kowis, 03/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/30/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Update of graphviz,
David Kowis, 03/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.