sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: Damien Mascord <tusker AT tusker.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:01:57 +0100
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:45:57AM +0800, Damien Mascord wrote:
> </snip>
>
> > I'm tired of writing so if you'd like to add your own experiences or
> > fun with gcc installs please feel free to reply ;)
> >
> > - David Brown
>
> Hi David,
>
> I would like to add that software that makes use of a particular gcc
> version way of compiling, such as qemu, would enable it to be
> compiled with gcc-3.4, and the kernel, and most other things compiled with
> gcc-4.0/4.1.
We already have that in spells. A spell can specify what gcc version it
needs and a function will set up paths to our current spells in /opt so
they get used.
> If you can figure out a way to implement this, as an "end-user" I'm all for
> it!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Damien
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install,
David Brown, 03/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install,
Damien Mascord, 03/08/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install, David Brown, 03/08/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install,
sqweek, 03/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install, David Brown, 03/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install, Andrew, 03/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc parallel vs. /opt install,
Damien Mascord, 03/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.