sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:47:32 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
Any more comments on this thread? any opposition? We havent heard anything
from you lace, do the proposals satisfy your concerns?
Yea, I am satisfied. :-)
Thank all for your opinions.
Summarize:
We will have e16 and e17, e16-profile and e17-profile spells.
Now we have to integrate "e" section from test grimoire to stable-rc and
stable grimoire, rename (deprecate) enlightenment spell to e16 spell.
After some time (one month?) the fake spell enlightenment (or just "e"?)
can wake from the dead.
It just ask which version (e16, e17, both) should be installed, of
course stable16 can be default.
It can use the new function "config_query_checkbox".
I'll get to finishing this then, thanks. :)
I think enlightenment will be the profile package for all E (e16, e17,
future e*) from what I understand of the conversation, and would
probably use config_query for each e* until/if config_query_checkbox
is added into stable Sorcery, then switched to that (though I hate
dialogs during spellcasting ;)).
Defaulting to e16 being installed, e17 not (until it becomes stable).
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEDJ/oHXt9dKjv3WERAmNGAJ9h8w+WPG89B8Gvfr0oz/B6uC6bRACgyi8I
4P+7IHUDbKKTx9Y5SeHZ36M=
=qzrM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Andrew Stitt, 03/01/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Eric Sandall, 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Andrew, 03/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Eric Sandall, 03/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 03/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Andrew, 03/05/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Eric Sandall, 03/01/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 03/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.