Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] mod_rewrite and Apache2

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Cory S <fubeca AT gmail.com>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] mod_rewrite and Apache2
  • Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:47:19 -0700

Filed as bug 10489.

On 2/3/06, Cory S <fubeca AT gmail.com> wrote:
> The spell asks which modules you would like to have built-in and I
> explicitly selected mod_rewrite. Apparently you can have some modules
> built as dynamically-loaded modules but the install log didn't have
> any modules that I could see. I'm really not sure how to tell the
> spell to build the dynamic modules. LoadModule only works with the
> dynamic modules so I don't think it would work to put it in
> httpd.conf.
>
> I will file a bug with the compile log attached and will also try the
> httpd-dev spell to see how that works.
>
> Thanks
>
> On 2/3/06, Sergey A. Lipnevich <sergey AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
> > David Kowis wrote:
> > >> Do you have a proper "LoadModule" instruction in httpd.conf?
> > >>
> > > If the module is compiled in, then a LoadModule instruction will cause
> > > errors as well...
> > >
> >
> > Ah, you're right, "-l" is "compiled in." Why is our apache2 spell
> > compiling mod_rewrite in is the question I have, although it probably
> > has nothing to do with this problem.
> >
> > Cory,
> >
> > If you move the mod_rewrite instruction to httpd.conf and do a simple
> > "httpd -t" does it say "Syntax OK?" Could you file a bug and attach your
> > compile log for apache2?
> > Also, may I ask you to try the "httpd-dev" spell and see if it makes any
> > difference?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sergey.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page