sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:44:11 -0500
I thought all spells in the standard grimoires had to be able to compile
when unattended. So a spell that needs X to be poked or prodded by the
user would have to go in z-rejected.
On Tue, 2006-10-01 at 15:53 -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, neuron wrote:
> <snip>
> > In fact, I'm not sure if it's bug. Do we have rule that spell is
> > forbidden to use X during compilation and installation ?
> >
> > I don't have problems filing bugs, just thought that others might be
> > interested in this problem, so I wrote to ML. Say a word and I'll turn
> > it into bug :)
>
> Well, if it breaks the compile at any point then yes, it's a bug. :)
> Though that doesn't make it z-rejected material, IMO.
>
> - -sandalle
>
> - --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDxEkAHXt9dKjv3WERAtwFAJ45jY+mqCNVMdiInQ+JADnUFhchNACgqR5I
> 1oAyfa7k1eRPfm07bx2y/0g=
> =iFit
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
neuron, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
neuron, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Paul Mahon, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting, neuron, 01/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Paul Mahon, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
neuron, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell needs X for casting,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.