sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:27:17 -0500
Actually, I said I support "going free" but only if it can be pragmatically executed while retaining control over important things. The tricky part so far seems to be z-rejected, and to me it's unclear how we can maintain it without z-rejected being part of the distribution.
Paul Beel wrote:
I agree with Sergey and Dufflebunk on this. I don't
think it is worth it to make SMGL totally free. Seems
like a big change and we would not be gaining much out
of it.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Arwed von Merkatz, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Eric Sandall, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, David Kowis, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Andrew, 11/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Seth Alan Woolley, 11/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL as GNU-certified Free(R)(TM) Distro?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.