Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Nov 01, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT optimaltec.com] wrote:
> Maybe I didn't express myself clearly enough... What I said is: if 
> Drupal has a Wiki, let's use (and maintain, and backup, and customize, 
> and configure) Drupal's Wiki, because we plan to use the whole product 
> *anyway*, *unless* there's a feedback that tells this can't be done.

Yeah, the question is the definition of "wiki" and if this drupal module
provides what people are after from a wiki.  Need some kind of feedback to
indicate that it does, since previously it was said it didn't give
everything.  But that was before we had it installed somewhere and someone
looked at it.

> Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> > On Nov 01, Sergey A. Lipnevich [sergey AT optimaltec.com] wrote:
> >   
> >> I never tried to do any productive work in either of these, but I 
> >> suggest that unless there's feedback, Drupal is used for everything for 
> >> the sake of simplicity. It's easier to manage and backup one data store 
> >> rather than two.
> >>     
> >
> > We have significant feedback both in this ML and on IRC that we need some
> > form of wiki.  The question right now is if we need a standalone one as 
> > has
> > been discussed in some detail or if drupal's wiki module is enough.

Attachment: pgpqEU7mguX6b.pgp
Description: PGP signature