Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
<snip>
> Comments seem to be summed up as:
>
> A.  People aren't convinced things would make it quickly or easily to
>    Drupal (me included).
>
> B.  moinmoin seems fine for the wiki.
>
> C.  The wiki will be readable by anyone.  Anyone who wants to contribute
>    can register for write access, but registrations have to be approved by
>    leads.
>
> Does that capture everything?
>
> For (A), as noted I think we can automate this to some extent, and I think
> it's worth trying to work this way regardless.  The worst case scenario
> seems to be that we end up with lots of docs in the wiki that aren't in
> drupal, and I'm not sure how bad of a scenario that really is.  We still
> would have docs, and it would mostly indicate we do a better job at just
> keeping them in a wiki, and we need to revisit the whole "one site to bind
> them" strategy.
>
> Are we good enough to move forward with this as we rebuild?

That sums it up, IMO. I think we can keep Problem A to a minimum after
the initial influx of documentation when the site goes live.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXxX4HXt9dKjv3WERApvvAJ0btWbX7ig94RfSw97W9oHXYNN2ngCgg4/5
FSqYYa70sgtcpF4GOYbTy+w=
=KWkQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----