Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance
  • Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
<snip>
Honestly my own opinion would probably favor more open (registered) wiki
access. blogs don't sound like a very efficient method for feedback and
collaboration to me... but I'm not a big fan of blogs. In general I'd say
I'm less interested in seeing them become much more than an extra feature
the website has for those that want to use them. Pragmatically this is
just to prevent burnout... people already need to check the MLs, IRC
channels, bugzilla, web site, wiki, and possibly forums to know what's
going on, and I don't know many that take time to do all of that. Adding
one more channel sounds like a lot.

I think blogs can be fun, but here I just mentioned them as an
alternative to letting just anyone modify our supposedly
developers-only content.

We could just say that 'developer' for our wiki is anyone interested
in helping write content for us, but they'd still need to go through
the approval process I mentioned earlier.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXXFZHXt9dKjv3WERAoHmAJ9zKMuv4Mdxc3o6yABUaIkAFxo9HgCgt9IL
UB0yzVd54wZaLLu6I+3KtfY=
=Mc/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page