Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
<snip>
> Honestly my own opinion would probably favor more open (registered) wiki
> access.  blogs don't sound like a very efficient method for feedback and
> collaboration to me... but I'm not a big fan of blogs.  In general I'd say
> I'm less interested in seeing them become much more than an extra feature
> the website has for those that want to use them.  Pragmatically this is
> just to prevent burnout... people already need to check the MLs, IRC
> channels, bugzilla, web site, wiki, and possibly forums to know what's
> going on, and I don't know many that take time to do all of that.  Adding
> one more channel sounds like a lot.

I think blogs can be fun, but here I just mentioned them as an
alternative to letting just anyone modify our supposedly
developers-only content.

We could just say that 'developer' for our wiki is anyone interested
in helping write content for us, but they'd still need to go through
the approval process I mentioned earlier.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXXFZHXt9dKjv3WERAoHmAJ9zKMuv4Mdxc3o6yABUaIkAFxo9HgCgt9IL
UB0yzVd54wZaLLu6I+3KtfY=
=Mc/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----