sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . .
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:22:38 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason Flatt wrote:
> When there is a version bump for the j2sdk-bin spell (and, I'm assuming,
> though I haven't tested, the j2sdk spell, as well), the PATH gets changed,
> because the version number is in the directory name. The problem is that
> the
> new PATH doesn't take affect until a re-login, and if db (I don't know if
> anything else has this same behavior) is dependant on j2sdk, it wants to
> rebuild because of the TRIGGERS file, but can't because "no acceptable Java
> compiler found in $PATH". Clear as mud? What I'm wondering is if we
> should
> add something to the j2sdk-bin spell, like sourcing the profile file in
> FINAL, or is this just one of those things that we will have to deal with?
>
This also happens with things like casting apache and apr0 or apr. A new
shell has to be created so that apache can find apr. It may not be
apache that's got the problem, but I've had to do this a few times with
different spells.
IMO it should be the spell that modifys /etc/profile that does the
reloading to ensure that any other spells following it have that
information. Not the other way around.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDVYO+tgErhgxHMHsRAlUtAJ0c+MeeWuNWHre776Au92MqNoc69wCggmew
JDAa+qnHd1zIk0UnGfYkmP8=
=RfqT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . ., Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/18/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . .,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . ., Jason Flatt, 10/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . ., Andrew, 10/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . ., Eric Sandall, 10/18/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . .,
David Kowis, 10/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] j2sdk Question . . ., Andrew, 10/18/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.