sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:26:33 -0400
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> talking to you, and look at what they are saying, and ask yourself
> what's more likely, that there's some GPG conspiracy sweeping through
No conspiracy. I believe Jeremy made it clear that the agenda of the sorcery
team is such that they don't want to support hashes.
Tread lightly, and dont make such generalizations/omissions.
Given that none of the three primary contributers to this thread arguing
for removing hash support are sorcery team members, I think its safe
to say that it isn't *just* the sorcery team's "agenda". These people are
arguing on their own accord, with their own free time. I would say that
the majority of vocal smgl community members think there is an advantage
to using gpg as opposed to continuing to use hashes.
I misunderstood their statements then. Alright, it's not just sorcery team's
agenda. Fair enough.
Sergey.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, dave, 08/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Andrew, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Dave Josephsen, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/31/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/31/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.