Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>]

> 
> > talking to you, and look at what they are saying, and ask yourself
> > what's more likely, that there's some GPG conspiracy sweeping through
> 
> No conspiracy. I believe Jeremy made it clear that the agenda of the sorcery
> team is such that they don't want to support hashes.
> 

Tread lightly, and dont make such generalizations/omissions.

Given that none of the three primary contributers to this thread arguing
for removing hash support are sorcery team members, I think its safe
to say that it isn't *just* the sorcery team's "agenda". These people are
arguing on their own accord, with their own free time. I would say that
the majority of vocal smgl community members think there is an advantage
to using gpg as opposed to continuing to use hashes.

-Andrew

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt                           | astitt at sourcemage.org    |
|irc: afrayedknot                          | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus    | acedit at armory.com        |
|Sorcery Team Lead                         | ftp://t.armory.com/         |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------