Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
  • Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:33:40 -0700

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:15:58PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Quoting David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>:
>
> >>> definition of what a signature is for. You're the only one disagreeing
> >>> with us all on the definition of a signature. I've a strong feeling
> >>> that we're going to move forward with replacing the hashes with gnupg
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that the final consensus that hashes are not going to be supported?
> >>
> > I cannot speak for the entirety of the Source Mage community, but
> > I've no problems with it, and no one else has voiced disagreement.
>
> I believe it's time to answer that question. Who's authorized to seal the
> decision, sorcery lead or the project lead?
>

It isn't my decision alone as it crosses team boundaries.

I believe consensus of the team leads should be the final decision,
perhaps ultimately conveyed/summarized by the PL.

For the record, I share the view of the other team leads who have
participated in the thread thusfar.

-Andrew

--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgp0xDNuWc9It.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page