sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support

From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:27:33 -0400

Quoting David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>:

definition of what a signature is for. You're the only one disagreeing
with us all on the definition of a signature. I've a strong feeling that we're going to move forward with replacing the hashes with gnupg

Is that the final consensus that hashes are not going to be supported?

Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support , (continued)