Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper
  • Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:12:19 +0200

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:03:05AM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> I think so too. My question is to those who know more about scrollkeeper, if
> it's OK not to care about these files. For example, if they're not there
> (e.g.
> /var/scrollkeeper is clean and scrollkeeper spell is resurrected from source
> cache), can scrollkeeper recreate them?

It's been a while since I really dealt with scrollkeeper, but as far as
I remember all that's needed to rebuild the /var/scrollkeeper stuff is a
scrollkeeper rebuild-db.

> Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
>
> > Those file should probably be marked as volatiles if they are changing
> > all the time.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:10:34PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> `cleanse --fix' mistakenly identifies many spells as broken because
> >> of changes
> >> under /var/scrollkeeper. Is it safe not to track this directory
> >> altogether?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page