sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper

From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:03:05 -0400

I think so too. My question is to those who know more about scrollkeeper, if
it's OK not to care about these files. For example, if they're not there (e.g.
/var/scrollkeeper is clean and scrollkeeper spell is resurrected from source
cache), can scrollkeeper recreate them?

Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:

Those file should probably be marked as volatiles if they are changing
all the time.

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:10:34PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:

Hi All,

`cleanse --fix' mistakenly identifies many spells as broken because of changes
under /var/scrollkeeper. Is it safe not to track this directory altogether?

[SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper, Andrew, 08/21/2005
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/22/2005
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/22/2005
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] No tracking for /var/scrollkeeper, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/22/2005