sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] slocate vs locate
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:50:28 -0400
I was working on fixing this bug:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8165
and while trying to learn a little bit about locate/updatedb, I saw that
quite a few distributions are using slocate
http://www.geekreview.org/slocate/ vice the version from findutils.
Is this something we should look at? Probably good reasons for using
the version that we are now. I really don't know much about this, but
secure always sounds good.:) We would have to modify findutils to not
build locate, but I don't think it is too hard.
George Sherwood
-
[SM-Discuss] slocate vs locate,
George Sherwood, 06/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] slocate vs locate, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.