Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] slocate vs locate

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] slocate vs locate
  • Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:06:38 -0400

There's also rlocate that looks interesting, but young:
http://osx.freshmeat.net/projects/rlocate/

Quoting George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>:

I was working on fixing this bug:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8165

and while trying to learn a little bit about locate/updatedb, I saw that
quite a few distributions are using slocate
http://www.geekreview.org/slocate/ vice the version from findutils.

Is this something we should look at? Probably good reasons for using
the version that we are now. I really don't know much about this, but
secure always sounds good.:) We would have to modify findutils to not
build locate, but I don't think it is too hard.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page