sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 17:57:38 +0200
Geoffrey Derber wrote :
> PGP verify signed message
> gpg: Signature made ned 05 jun 2005 17:19:20 CEST using DSA key ID D5279A12
> gpg: Good signature from "Geoffrey Derber <gderber AT sourcemage.org>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: A31B 49C3 3CE3 6AE5 265D B47B C523 6A4D D527 9A12
> PGP verification success
>
>
> I wanted to propose that we limit the use of ARCHIVE=off. The main
> problem with using this variable, while it may seem pointless to create
> the archive for a spell like, ipw2200-firmware (which is binary), it
> limits the ability to downgrade using 'dispel -d'. If the newer version
> does not work for one reason or another, adding the ARCHIVE=off variable
> creates more trouble.
>
> I'm not saying don't use it, but I would like that we only use it if
> resurection breaks things (nvidia_driver), and even then, maybe try to
> find out the why it does not work, and try to fix the cause.
>
> Geoffrey Derber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
I don't like the ARCHIVE=off as well... I would prefer to
have an ARCHIVE=ask instead of off since I'd like to keep
older caches of such spells...
--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
http://ruskie.dtdm.org/blog/
-
[SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off,
Geoffrey Derber, 06/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 06/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off, Seth Alan Woolley, 06/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off, Ladislav Hagara, 06/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off,
neuron, 06/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off,
Eric Sandall, 06/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off, Geoffrey Derber, 06/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off,
Eric Sandall, 06/06/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [SM-Discuss] ARCHIVE=off, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.