Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 11:02:45PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:09:24PM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Thanks for your work on this. :) Two questions:
> > 1. Should spells with USEGCC2 be converted to this new format
> 
> Eventually they should, though I haven't actually tested it with gcc 2
> yet. But the plan is to first make this work in all cases, then have it
> merged back into sorcery, as sorcery can make some stuff easier (like
> not having to call invoke_gcc in BUILD).
> If it works for gcc2, then we should probably convert the spells to use
> it, so we can replace libgcc2 in sorcery by this libgcc.
> 
> > 2. Did you change GCC_VERSION=34 to GCC_VERSION=3.4 or is that a typo?
> > (I haven't read the Perforce logs yet, so just say RTFC if needed :)).
> 
> Both are valid for GCC_VERSION. libgcc just removes all '.' from the
> variable and uses that as postfix for /opt/gcc<postfix>.
 
And here I am taking this sentence back right away :)
Only GCC_VERSION=3.4 will work correctly with my latest changes. This is
because I changed the invoke_gcc function to not do anything if the user
already uses the correct gcc version.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org