sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such
- From: Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:41:59 +0200
Le mercredi 20 avril 2005 à 11:33 +0200, Benoit PAPILLAULT a écrit :
> Seth Alan Woolley a écrit :
> > The list below is more accurate, as the perl-deprecateds will be deleted
> > and didn't have history entries put on them when they were made
> > deprecated.
>
> >>Maybe sorcery should assume a spell with INSTALL in it is build api 2?
> >>
> >>Or we could just fix these spells...
>
> Fixing spell is easier IMO and it's better that spells work as they
> should do and as we have documented, instead of adding a new (and
> useless) feature to sorcery.
Yes, we can't add a sorcery feature for every mistake made by
developers... ;-)
Fixing spells sounds well better, even if Sandalle should definitively
be no longer your friend, Seth :-D
--
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
Flavien Bridault
Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Section Guru
irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Flavien Bridault, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Andrew, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Andrew, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Flavien Bridault, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Eric Sandall, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.