sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:27:57 -0700
Quoting Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>:
> The list below is more accurate, as the perl-deprecateds will be deleted
> and didn't have history entries put on them when they were made deprecated.
>
> Looks like Eric needs to be taken out back and shot for god and country.
> Although it was on Feb 28th that he really messed everything up.
>
> Seth
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:50:27AM -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > Trying to build pciutils, I noticed it didn't install anything.
> >
> > Reason was that it was built with build api 2, but there was no
> > indication anywhere that it was a build api 2 spell.
> >
> > So I looked for a list of spells in build api 1 but with an INSTALL file
> > in them. Here it is, and you'll note I'm also guilty on one (granted
> > when I look at nail's install file, it's pretty much the same as the
> > default install to prove that I indeed tested it):
> >
> > mail/nail/INSTALL
> > 2004-07-24 Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
> > graphics/gsculpt/INSTALL
> > 2005-02-28 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > utils/pciutils/INSTALL
> > 2005-04-07 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > editors/par/INSTALL
> > 2005-01-21 Pieter Lenaerts <e-type AT cwazy.co.uk>
> > editors/xfig/INSTALL
> > 2005-02-28 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > windowmanagers/iceme/INSTALL
> > 2005-03-17 Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> > windowmanagers/docker/INSTALL
> > 2005-01-14 Pieter Lenaerts <e-type AT cwazy.co.uk>
> > perl-cpan/XML-Writer/INSTALL
> > 2005-04-07 Rafael George <george.rafael AT gmail.com>
> > perl-cpan/Lingua-EN-Numbers/INSTALL
> > 2005-05-17 Rafael George <george.rafael AT gmail.com>
> > perl-cpan/bundle-cpan/INSTALL
> > 2005-02-24 Thomas Houssin <Thomas.Houssin AT sourcemage.org>
> > perl-cpan/Lingua-Ispell/INSTALL
> > 2005-05-17 Rafael George <george.rafael AT gmail.com>
> > perl-cpan/Mail-Internet/INSTALL
> > 2005-05-17 Rafael George <george.rafael AT gmail.com>
> > collab/nag/INSTALL
> > 2005-03-07 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > collab/mnemo/INSTALL
> > 2005-02-28 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > collab/whups/INSTALL
> > 2005-02-28 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > fdo-libs/xserver-profile/INSTALL
> > 2004-07-20 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > gnome2-apps/gdeskcal/INSTALL
> > 2004-12-16 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
> > audio-libs/mp3burn/INSTALL
> > 2004-12-13 Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
> >
> > Maybe sorcery should assume a spell with INSTALL in it is build api 2?
> >
> > Or we could just fix these spells...
> >
<snip>
Fixed, and you may want to note that not all of those were my fault, but I was
just the last to edit the spells (e.g. gdeskcal), though most of mine we're my
fault. ;) I could always take a break on the grimoire work if my changes are
too buggy for y'all.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Flavien Bridault, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Andrew, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Andrew, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Flavien Bridault, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Eric Sandall, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such, Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] build_api 2 spells that are not marked as such,
Seth Alan Woolley, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.