sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:50:42 -0700
Should be
local base_deps
Everyone relax, we're not using locate for anything, i fucked up,
nothing to see here, move along, move along.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:33:04AM -0400, Paul Mahon wrote:
> Most likely it should be locate_base_deps, but where are you finding
> that? It's not in p4...
>
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 08:25 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > I think it was a typo for local:
> >
> > libdepends:
> >
> > function private_run_depends()
> > {
> > debug "libdepends" "$FUNCNAME - $*"
> > local SPELL=$1
> > local NEW_DEPENDS=""
> > local spell_depends
> > hash_put "depends_looked_at" "$SPELL" "start"
> >
> > locate base_deps <---------------<----------<-------<---<--<<<<<<
> > base_deps=$(search_depends_status $DEPENDS_STATUS basesystem|cut -f2
> > -d:)
> >
> >
> > ^^^^ that looks like it should be local base_deps to me.
> >
> > Seth
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:15:11AM -0500, sergey AT optimaltec.com wrote:
> > > It looks like the latest devel sorcery is using `locate.' I can see the
> > > messages
> > > that /var/cache/locatedb is missing. I don't think locate is part of the
> > > basesystem. Any reason for this?
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Sergey.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpD9KXz03YXa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?,
Paul Mahon, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?,
Jeremy Kolb, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?, Paul Mahon, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?, sergey, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?,
Jeremy Kolb, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?,
Paul Mahon, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?,
Paul Mahon, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?, Andrew, 04/04/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.