Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Using 'locate' in sorcery?
  • Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:33:04 -0400

Most likely it should be locate_base_deps, but where are you finding
that? It's not in p4...

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 08:25 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> I think it was a typo for local:
>
> libdepends:
>
> function private_run_depends()
> {
> debug "libdepends" "$FUNCNAME - $*"
> local SPELL=$1
> local NEW_DEPENDS=""
> local spell_depends
> hash_put "depends_looked_at" "$SPELL" "start"
>
> locate base_deps <---------------<----------<-------<---<--<<<<<<
> base_deps=$(search_depends_status $DEPENDS_STATUS basesystem|cut -f2 -d:)
>
>
> ^^^^ that looks like it should be local base_deps to me.
>
> Seth
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:15:11AM -0500, sergey AT optimaltec.com wrote:
> > It looks like the latest devel sorcery is using `locate.' I can see the
> > messages
> > that /var/cache/locatedb is missing. I don't think locate is part of the
> > basesystem. Any reason for this?
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Sergey.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page