Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] extending usage of sm-spell-submit list

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] extending usage of sm-spell-submit list
  • Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:21:47 +0200

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:16:50AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we recently had some bugs that affect the whole grimoire, like wrong
> > SPELL variables. It would be nice to have some team email to assign such
> > bugs to so all grimoire gurus can see them, like the sorcery team has
> > with sm-sorcery-bugs.
> > We already have the sm-spell-submit list that all grimoire gurus should
> > be subscribed to, so I thought of reusing that one.
> > In addition to that new spells could also be assigned to sm-spell-submit
> > by default so they don't always have to go through one bottleneck (me).
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux
> > developer
>
> I dislike "reusing" lists, especially one that's currently in use and can
> (at
> times) have a lot of e-mails go through it. However, we can try it and see
> (I
> especially like the idea of the New Spells going to all the grimoire gurus)
> and
> we can work it out if we run into problems.

Yeah, I thought about that. It could make sm-spell-submit a really high
traffic list, but since all grimoire gurus should subscribe both to
sm-spell-submit and to the bug list I don't see a big problem there. If
it gets too much we can always create a seperate list for this later.

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page