sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:32:58 +0200
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:27:16 -0800
Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com> wrote:
> Just thought id share that theres two cracklib spells in the devel
> grimoire (as well as several other spells)
>
> cracklib /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/libs
>
> cracklib /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/security-libs
>
That's what happens when devs don't work from an up-to-date local p4 tree.
That spell has been moved to security-libs a number of times...
In the end i just gave up.
I'm also pretty sure there are more spells which are in a couple of places in
the grimoire. linux-pam is another one which keeps popping up in different
places. This will continue to happen untill everyone syncs their p4 tree
before
editing it.
When linux-pam started to refuse to build without cracklib i added the
cracklib
spell. It might be able to be optional, when someone edits the Makefile.
at the time it seemed easier to add the cracklib spell.
The cracklib spell broke in less than a week due to them wanting --referer set
The spell in security-libs was updated to download it using --referer.
If anyone knows another wordlist which we could use in the spell that might be
a better solution. Because they obviously don't want people downloading it
without visiting their website.
Arjan
> libkipi /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/kde
>
> libkipi /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/kde-apps
>
> pixieplus /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/kde
>
> pixieplus /var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel/kde-apps
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:30:21PM -0600, sergey AT optimaltec.com wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > SOURCE2 for cracklib is the wordlist from COTSE.com website. They stopped
> > providing this file for download if referer is not set. Because linux-pam
> > requires cracklib now, neither cracklib nor linux-pam can be cast. Should
> > cracklib be optional for linux-pam?
> >
> > Sergey.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
+=======
Proud Source Mage GNU/Linux developer,
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org
Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
GnuPG Key 79D4B14E = 94AD 3FD1 E259 67ED 632E 2B06 CFBE 1154 79D4 B14E
+===
Attachment:
pgpVLI42Ced5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib,
Arjan Bouter, 04/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib, Eric Sandall, 04/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Wordlist from COTSE for cracklib, Andrew, 04/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.