sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:27:06 -0600
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:Yep, I thought I'd set the settings for Architecture, but apparantly not. That
My conclusion was that NPTL is not supported on i386 :-(. What
architecture did you select in sorcery?
I agree, I had almost exactly the same problem the other day, I switched
to pentium and it worked fine. The arch appears to be i386:
>gcc ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc-lowlevellock.c -c -std=gnu99 -O
>-Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -march=i386 -pipe
I filed a bug against glibc such that it should refuse to build nptl if
the arch is i386.
was it.
Stoopid kowis :)
--
One login to rule them all, one login to find them. One login to bring them all,
and in the web bind them.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Attachment:
pgpUO3l7N0yZh.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
Attachment:
binpOyhhGP9yh.bin
Description: PGP Public Key
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc,
Craig Dyke, 03/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, Seth Alan Woolley, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arjan Bouter, 03/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, Craig Dyke, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arjan Bouter, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
David Kowis, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Andrew, 03/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, David Kowis, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Andrew, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/14/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.