sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:47:23 -0600
Craig Dyke wrote:
Howdy allSame here, but a different problem something with nptl:
Not sure if I missed something along the way with all the emails about glibc 2.3.4,
but, I have been unable to get it to cast successfully.
gcc ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc-lowlevellock.c -c -std=gnu99 -O
-Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -march=i386 -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -I../include -I.
-I/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4.bld/nptl -I.. -I../libio -I/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4.bld
-I../sysdeps/i386/elf -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386
-I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/pthread
-I../sysdeps/pthread -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix
-I../nptl/sysdeps/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386
-I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common
-I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/i386
-I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix
-I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/i386/fpu -I../sysdeps/i386
-I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96
-I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754
-I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /usr/li
b/gcc/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/include -isystem
/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4/linux-libc-headers-2.6.10.0/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT
-D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -o
/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4.bld/nptl/libc-lowlevellock.o -MD -MP -MF
/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4.bld/nptl/libc-lowlevellock.o.dt -MT
/usr/src/glibc-2.3.4.bld/nptl/libc-lowlevellock.o
In file included from ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc-lowlevellock.c:21:
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c:29: error: conflicting types
for '__lll_lock_wait'
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h:227: error: previous
declaration of '__lll_lock_wait' was here
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c:29: error: conflicting types
for '__lll_lock_wait'
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/lowlevellock.h:227: error: previous
declaration of '__lll_lock_wait' was here
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c: In function `__lll_lock_wait':
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c:32: warning: implicit
declaration of function `atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq'
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c:36: warning: implicit
declaration of function `atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq'
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c: In function
`__lll_timedlock_wait':
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/lowlevellock.c:71: warning: implicit
declaration of function `lll_futex_timed_wait'
I've cleanse --fixed and this is the only spell that's broke. I suppose
turning off nptl support will make it happy, but I like threading ;)
--
One login to rule them all, one login to find them. One login to bring them
all, and in the web bind them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc,
Craig Dyke, 03/13/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, Seth Alan Woolley, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arjan Bouter, 03/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, Craig Dyke, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Arjan Bouter, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
David Kowis, 03/13/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Andrew, 03/14/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc, David Kowis, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Andrew, 03/14/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/14/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.