sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?
- From: "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:20:59 +0100
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:47:22PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> We could have a machine (or better yet a cluster of machines) who's sole
> job is
> to do the following:
> 1) Update test and stable Perforce repositories on the machine
> 2) Pull in changes from test to stable that have been in test for at least
> two
> weeks
> 3) Resolve the differences (probably `p4 resolve -at`)
> 4) Run Prometheus[0] on what's in the not-yet-submitted stable
> 5) Once Prometheus is done, revert any spells that failed and then submit
> the
> rest
> 6) Rinse and repeat every week/two weeks/month/whatever interval we can get
> Prometheus to finish the stable grimoire in. ;)
>
> Would this be feasible or even wanted?
>
> -sandalle
>
> [0] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Prometheus
Seems like a good start to me even though it's a bit complicated.
Alternatively, after step 3) we could generate a not-yet-submitted
stable grimoire for all the ppl that wanna test it so that they can use
it to make a `sorcery system-update` and sort out what cast fine and
what doesn't (kindof what would do Prometheus indeed ;)). Then apply
stage 5) as well.
Mathieu.
--
We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
--
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Mathieu L., 02/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Andrew, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Eric Sandall, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Andrew, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Jeremy Blosser, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Andrew, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Mathieu L., 02/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, dave, 02/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "staging" grimoire instead of devel for development spells as opposed to WIP spells?, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.