sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:28:50 +0100
Le Jeudi 24 Février 2005 19:19, Andrew a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 07:16:18PM +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> > > A warning to everyone on test grimoire who can't afford to recompile a
> > > lot of stuff right now: gcc 3.4 comes with yet another binary
> > > incompatible libstdc++, so all c++ programs have to be recompiled after
> > > it's updated. If you don't want to do all those recompiles now you
> > > should put gcc on hold.
> >
> > I think this would be good to prevent the user INSIDE the spell, maybe as
> > I did with udev. If someone didn't read your mail, cast gcc and then
> > reboot, he will have a completely broken system.
> >
> > About this, I'm currently doing a "cleanse" to recompile all spells by
> > the new libstdc++. But a lot of spells are failing because they are not
> > checked according to their dependencies. For example, the spells
> > sdl_image, sdl_mixer, etc... failed because sdl is checked farther. As
> > well for spells depending on qt. Is there a way to do this ?? Or would it
> > be rather a feature request ??
>
> Spells are checked from the bottom of the depends tree up, in other
> words if foo depends on bar, we check bar before we check foo, if the
> depends tree is broken, incomplete, or in some other way wrong theres
> nothing cleanse can do about it.
>
> -Andrew
So that way it should work ? Mmmh... So what does that mean ? My depends tree
is broken ??
Here on my box the spells are checked in the same order as shown with :
gaze installed
So the older casted spell is checked first, and the latest at last... Is this
a bug ??
--
Flavien Bridault
Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Guru
IRC : vlaaad
Jabber : vlaaad AT amessage.be
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgppCt8s3iNce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable, Flavien Bridault, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Eric Sandall, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Eric Sandall, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable, Flavien Bridault, 02/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Seth Alan Woolley, 02/25/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable, Andrew, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Eric Sandall, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Eric Sandall, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/25/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Andrew, 02/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] new glibc hits stable,
Flavien Bridault, 02/24/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.