sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:54:38 +0100
Hi,
gcc 3.4.x has been in our devel grimoire for quite some time now, and I
believe we have found all major spells that break with it. Does anyone
still now of something really important that doesn't compile with gcc
3.4? If not, then we should finally get it into the test grimoire to
give it more testing with less common spells.
If I don't get any nays I'll pull it into test this weekend.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x,
Arwed von Merkatz, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Bas van Gils, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Eric Sandall, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x,
Eric Sandall, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Seth Alan Woolley, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Wolfgang Scheicher, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.4.x, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/15/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.